Why comparison kills your climbing
Measuring yourself against everyone else at the wall quietly drains the joy and progress out of climbing. Here is how to spot it and climb your own climb.
There is a moment a lot of climbers will recognise. You are working a problem at the edge of your ability, properly invested, falling and trying again, when someone strolls over, pulls on, and floats up it first go. Suddenly the problem you were proud to be attempting feels small, your effort feels embarrassing, and the session sours. Nothing about your climbing changed in those ten seconds. Only your story about it did. That story, told often enough, is one of the quietest ways climbers hold themselves back.
Comparison is almost impossible to avoid in a sport with numbers attached to everything. Grades invite it. The wall is full of other people doing visible things at visible difficulties. But left unchecked, the habit of measuring yourself against everyone else does real damage, and it is worth understanding how.
What comparison actually costs you
The obvious cost is enjoyment. Climbing is supposed to be fun, and constantly ranking yourself against strangers is a reliable way to make it stressful. But there are subtler costs too.
Comparison distorts your choices. When you are worried about how you look, you avoid the problems you might fail on in public, which are precisely the problems that would make you better. You gravitate to things you can already do, where you look competent, and your progress stalls because you have stopped operating at your edge. The climber quietly flailing on something too hard for them is often improving faster than the one cruising things to protect their ego.
It also robs you of your own milestones. Send your first of a grade, a genuinely big moment, and if your first thought is that someone else did it years ago at half your age, the achievement evaporates before you have even enjoyed it.
The only climbing comparison that reliably helps is you against yourself a few months ago. Everyone else is climbing a different route through a different body with a different history.
Why the comparison is rigged anyway
Even if you wanted to compare fairly, you cannot, because you are never seeing the full picture. The person who flashed your project might have been climbing for fifteen years. They might be built for that exact style, or have a wingspan that turns a desperate move into a reach. They might have wired that specific problem last week. You see five clean seconds and write a whole story about your own inadequacy from it, missing everything that came before.
Grades make this worse because they look objective. A V5 sounds like a fixed thing, the same for everyone, but grades are subjective, style-dependent and inconsistent between walls and crags. Your V5 nemesis and their V5 warm-up might share a number and almost nothing else. Treating that number as a clean ranking of human worth is a category error, and a stressful one. If grades feel more loaded than they should, the history of the grade is a useful bit of perspective on how arbitrary they really are.
Climbing your own climb
Breaking the habit is not about pretending you do not notice other people. It is about changing what you do with the noticing.
A few things that genuinely help:
- Track your own progress, privately. Log your sessions and look back over months, not days. Seeing your own line move up over time is far more motivating than any single comparison, and it is the whole reason why logging every session makes you a better climber.
- Define a good session by effort, not outcome. Did you try hard, work something at your limit, learn a move? That is a win regardless of what anyone else did.
- Use strong climbers as a resource, not a mirror. Watch their footwork. Ask for beta. Steal what you can use. That turns the person who would have intimidated you into the best thing in the room.
- Celebrate other people out loud. Genuinely cheering a stranger's send breaks the rivalry framing and makes the whole wall a better place to be. It also tends to come back around.
When the comparison is with your past self
There is one comparison that can also turn toxic, and it is comparing yourself to a fitter, stronger version of you from before an injury or a busy stretch of life. That one needs care. Coming back is its own process, and expecting to pick up exactly where you left off is a recipe for frustration and reinjury. Coming back from a climbing injury, mentally is worth a read if that is where you are.
The freedom on the other side
The climbers who seem to enjoy this sport the most, year after year, are almost never the ones obsessed with where they rank. They are the ones absorbed in their own climbing, chuffed with their own progress, generous about everyone else's, and largely unbothered by what the strong person in the corner is doing. That is not because they lack ambition. Many of them are quietly very good. It is because they worked out that the comparison was a tax they did not have to pay.
You do not need to conquer the impulse overnight. Just start noticing when it shows up, name it for what it is, and gently steer back to your own session. The problem in front of you, the move you are trying to crack, the small progress you made today: that is your climbing, and it is the only one you can actually do anything about. Climb that one, and let the rest of the room get on with theirs.
Header photo by paws and prints


